Thought I would pass along this link for those of you who, like me, find Bill Whittle’s narrative very persuasive.
Obama is (now quite obviously) the worst POTUS in our long history…but the sad thing is, there are worse Democrats in office today.
Thought I would pass along this link for those of you who, like me, find Bill Whittle’s narrative very persuasive.
Obama is (now quite obviously) the worst POTUS in our long history…but the sad thing is, there are worse Democrats in office today.
You get a much better result when you inculcate virtue on a private and individual basis than when you attempt to impose it from above. That’s why we conservatives are so concerned about the breakdown of the American family. It is within the context of a family that we are meant to learn to difference between right and wrong. In the absence of stable, socially supported family units, many people lose their way morally — and government dependence increases.
Stuff I’ve found ’round the interwebs:
More Weather Deaths? Wanna Bet?
by Donald Boudreaux @ WSJ
Writing recently in the Washington Post, environmental guru Bill McKibben asserted that the number and severity of recent weather events, such as the tornado in Joplin, Mo., are too great not to be the result of fossil-fuel induced climate change. He suggested that government’s failure to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases will result in more violent weather and weather-related deaths in the future.
And pointing to the tragedy in Joplin, Mr. McKibben summarily dismissed the idea that, if climate change really is occurring, human beings can successfully adapt to it.
There’s one problem with this global-warming chicken little-ism. It has little to do with reality. National Weather Service data on weather-related fatalities since 1940 show that the risks of Americans being killed by violent weather have fallen significantly over the past 70 years.
The longer lead times are probably the biggest help as far as survival rates go. The other night, the NWS issued a tornado warning for Dale City/Woodbridge for a storm that was speeding up the I-95 corridor, and sure enough, that warning preceeded any actual bad weather by about twenty minutes. Hooray for technology!
(By the way, there was no confirmed tornado, though conditions did get rather hairy for a bit.)
*****
Meanwhile, while I was away, Bill Whittle put out another vid, this time on Obama’s foreign policy:
*****
And lastly, in case you missed it, here is Iowahawk on our higher education bubble:
He is, of course, responding to reports that recent college graduates have had a lot of trouble finding jobs lately despite Obama’s glorious economic “recovery.”
Luckily, my teenaged students are smart. All of them are entering pre-professional programs and minoring in any passion that won’t guarantee them a job.
This time, he snags material from Iowahawk’s recent post on the folly of soaking the rich:
This one never made it to our blog, but I think it deserves some screen-time, just because it makes me giggle.
You can sum up Obama’s term thus far with one word.
FAIL
And this one goes right to my comments from yesterday regarding American desire and its’ dissipation from our cultural fabric:
If Whittle wanted to run for office, he’d have my vote…this guy is not only a brilliant debater and amongst the most confident and emotionally-controlled (yet emotionally driven) people I’ve ever seen speak…he’s also a throwback to a time when it was OK to love your country and be proud of all we’ve accomplished.
In an effort to prove, once again, that a purely public-funded “company” is utterly incapable of producing quality results at a reasonable cost, NASA failed once again to get a key set of scientific instruments into orbit…the fourth major equipment failure/disaster in the last 8 years. The Glory satellite had instruments that would be able to get accurate observations of atmospheric aerosol concentrations (small impurities in the basic soup that is the planet’s atmosphere) and their influences on Earth’s radiation budget, as well as an instrument that would make more accurate measurements of the total solar irradiance impacting the Earth. Those data would have been hugely helpful to the study of Earth’s changing climate, but instead, we are left with a cloud of debris falling into the Pacific and another group of skilled scientists with nothing to show for years of hard work. And all because NASA’s economic structure is deeply flawed.
First…some linkage on the news:
NASA fails the same way twice!
Now, some linkage to a great piece by Tea Party activist and space enthusiast Bill Whittle on the reason for NASA’s rising tide of utter failures and hemorrhaging funds – a hint: it all comes down to how public sector “businesses” make contracts with the private companies that they hire to do their work.
Let me bottom line this for you…if we ever want our space program to recover from its’ current doldrums, we must begin considering options for privatizing the mechanics of production. Let the scientists solve scientific problems and analyze the results. Let BUSINESS put us into space. I guarantee that the results will cost fewer lives, less money, and less time and produce better data.