I’m still buzzing from what I believe to have been a truly sensational Republican National Convention. No, it wasn’t all perfect, but the planners did a phenomenal job (a) staying on message (b) blasting the President without spending all of their energy being negative (c) introducing Mitt Romney and giving us a detailed biography of the man and (d) presenting the prominent leaders of Conservatism speaking in one clear voice- never clearer than when uttered by Mitt Romney himself. Mitt is a lot of things, but a vampire or a robot he is not. Nor is particularly thrilling. I get that too…he’s not the sensationally masterful speech-giver than Reagan was, nor does have have the magnetism and charm of Paul Ryan or Marco Rubio. What he does have is the look and sound of uber-competence and the street cred of an American President. Do you love the guy? Maybe you don’t think of him as someone you could connect with personally, but at least you can be assured that he does have passion and he does care for all of the people in his life – and that would include all of us if he were elected. That is what he had to accomplish – he had to appear presidential and he had to be reassuring and basically solid – like your construction-working grandfather or the Priest in your church in a time of Crisis or FDR over the radio in his fireside chats. I think he was able to get across that he loved his fellow men, that he was a diligent, competent, hard-working man of principle, and that he could get things done in Washington. He sold me, and anyone reading this blog knows that I was a tough sell all through the primaries.
I won’t give a blow-by-blow of convention events – our blogroll is exploding with good commentary on the RNC – all of it better than anything I can say. Instead…I’m going to reduce my thoughts to a bit of common sense. Liberals, conservatives, moderates of limited or mixed convictions – they all coexist in America – not often easily, but always peacefully. Politically motivated violence is astonishingly rare here. The reason should be obvious – we can coexist because we all have an equal right to speak…we share the bullhorn, and the guns don’t point at the side opposed to the commander in chief. It gives us all purpose – we know that we can make a difference here if we work hard enough, care deeply enough, and hone talents that can make our voices heard by a big enough audience. Even now – for all the talk of how the flow of money corrupts the ability of politicians to speak freely in a fair and equal exchange of ideas, hopes and dreams – the farthest left progressive and the farthest right tea-partier still has hope that their cause can be advanced and that they can change the country for the better. That principle – the freedom to speak and to be heard, the freedom to believe and to live your beliefs, the freedom to build a life and to keep that life without interference – must still be alive if the debate is this energized and the candidates this sharp in the delivery of their talking points and the elections this contentious. Neither side would fight this hard and expend this much capital and sweat and tears on advancing their causes if the battle of the free could not be joined.
So let me ask you folks this? Is that fight still important to us? I think it is. So do all of you, no matter your party affiliation. If something is important to you, you fight to defend it or you shy away and relinquish your desire to fight, knowing that such an action is a risk to that thing you hold precious. Americans by the millions have died because the basic principles of America were worth literally fighting and dying to defend in the minds of courageous soldiers in engagements major and minor throughout our history. So let me ask you…if you care about the freedom to join in the political squabbles of our time…who are the voices within our borders who are asking that those freedoms be curtailed? Who are the ones saying that certain forms of speech must be prohibited in the name of “fairness?” Such limitations on free speech and free practice of faith include:
- Speech codes and regulations on political activities on college campuses
- The abolition of any symbols or expressions of faith on public grounds
- The creation of “hate crime” legislation, designed to punish offenders differently if their motivations for committing a crime are ones we find distasteful
- The banning of businesses from towns and colleges whose owners and charitable foundations author political speech with which said towns disagree
- The censoring of journalism, imagery and inconvenient facts about a certain group of religious fundamentalists who – I believe it is still legal to point out – killed 3,000 US Citizens in an unprovoked and brutal attack on a clear September morning 11 years ago
- The attempted quashing of open debate regarding the nature and severity of man’s impact on global climate and other large-scale environmental causes
- The rewriting of Presidential histories, childhood text books and Hollywood movies in the name of sensitivity and multiculturalism
- The attempted outlawing of political speech by third party corporations and political action committees (thankfully struck down by the Supreme Court)
- The passage of campaign finance laws that make it illegal for candidates to speak for themselves within six weeks of an election without the help of a major news outlet
- The denial and cover-up of rampant one-sided media reporting in an attempt to control the narrative during key political debates
- The group of active feminists who routinely denigrate and disrespect housewives, declaring that they never worked a day in their lives and have nothing to contribute regarding gender relations
- The group of radical Islamists who will be attending the DNC in droves (20,000 strong!) in support of Obama with informative lectures about the need for Sharia law (you know, the doctrine that gives men the right to murder their wives if they commit adultery and treats women as property to be hidden from view and enjoyed as slaves by men of privilege) and the excesses of modern Christianity (you know…the faith that preaches respect for mothers, daughters and wives and protects women from being treated as property)
- The group that convenes in the Oval Office each week to discuss their next steps in the fight to stop mothers from having a choice in where their children go to school
- Or perhaps the group that came up with the brilliant lie that abortion, sex without commitment, lipstick feminism and single motherhood were liberating for women without any regard for the ever-increasing rate of female poverty, emotional wreckage and unhappiness (both in relationships and in the bedroom) experienced by today’s ‘liberated’ woman